I finally got around to see Lady Bird, Gretta Gerwig’s film starring Saoirse Ronan as Christine/Lady Bird, a teen nearing the end of High School trying to find her unique way in the world, while attending a Catholic school for girls. Despite some reservations I enjoyed it thoroughly.
It’s an entirely credible and touching portrayal of family life – there are plenty of loving frictions, testy exchanges, naiveté, predictable outcomes, unwholesome behaviour, pettiness and great tenderness. The mother daughter relationship is particularly fraught – Laurie Metcalf is excellent as the mother – while that of father and daughter is low key but quite touching.
In some ways it’s a typical US indie teen movie and there are a few clichéd elements – how many times have we seen a genuine character trying foolishly to impress the cool kids while abandoning their true friends but later learning some sense. But it’s done so well here – largely thanks to Saoirse Ronan’s fine performance, capturing innocence and a darker side equally well.
The Catholic school background is positively portrayed – the priests and nuns are cheerful and dedicated, with a very human side – an approach that’s a rarity in modern films. There’s a priest who is dedicated to develop school dramas and a nun who responds kindly to a prank because she enjoyed it - some students tie a ‘Just married to Jesus’ sign on the convent car, but eventually Lady Bird says Jesus is ‘a lucky guy’ to have nuns of that calibre married to him! It’s all portrayed with a warm humanity.
The students are shown as not being that interested in religion – sometimes we see them respectful at Mass, but then again we find two of them, including Lady Bird, wolfing down communion hosts – while stressing that they are not consecrated. She declares very certainly that she does NOT want to go to Catholic colleges after high school. In her more rebellious phase she ridicules a teacher giving a pro-life talk, but it may be more the character than the film that is mocking her. She says just because something looks ugly doesn’t mean it’s morally wrong. Towards the end there is a church scene that is quite positive, but to say more would be a spoiler.
There are some stereotypes – the large Catholic family, the Irish girls getting ‘sloshed’ before noon on St Patrick’s Day. Though Catholic schooling is presented in a positive light, there is much in the values on show that are not in harmony with Catholic teaching (predictably in attitudes to pre-marital sex). There is quite a bit of foul language, the inevitable gay sub plot, very frank sexual dialogue and a few scenes of sexual activity that are strong enough but perhaps relatively restrained by modern standards (which aren’t very high in this area!) I’d suggest there’s little to suit school use in terms of suitable clips, though perhaps the scene where we expect the nun to scold Lady Bird because of the prank might be useful to portray kindness and understanding, and the scene where the priest tries to get the drama class to cry on cue is rather moving.
There's quite a collection of music on the soundtrack including Rosa Mystica, Performed by the University of Notre Dame Folk Choir with Music by Chrysogonus Waddell, OCSO.
10/8/18 On RTE 1 last week I watched Spotlight, a challenging film that outlined in dramatic form the Boston Globe’s investigation into child sexual abuse by priests in that diocese and the subsequent cover-up by Church authorities. The film’s approach was restrained, but of course the abuse highlighted was appalling and any discomfort of Catholic viewers pales into minor significance by comparison. On an artistic level the film was absorbing as the newspaper’s ‘Spotlight’ team forensically investigated the abuse and how it was handled by Church authorities. Civil society, including journalism, didn’t escape lightly either – there was considerable reluctance in police circles to bring abusive priests to book, lawyers facilitated confidential settlements, and even staff at the Boston Globe ignored or missed information sent to them years previously. The film proceeded almost thriller-like with its investigation of the facts, and certainly there was no cheap voyeurism or melodrama. And yet the crusading narrative was somewhat simplistic at times – too often it felt like ‘journalists good, priests bad’. At one stage it was suggested that 6% of priests were likely to abuse, but we got to see precious little of the 94% (there are passing references to two priests who helped, including one auxiliary bishop). I thought there was little of broader context or insight into the phenomenon, e.g. in a throwaway remark it was suggested without evidence that celibacy was at the heart of the problem, and there was no sense that abuse figures for non-Catholic clergy and other professions are similar. There was one scene where an elderly priest tried to rationalise his behaviour to one of the journalists but this intriguing conversation was cut short by the priest’s sister who shut the door on the journalist.
The film should act as a salutary tale to faithful mature Catholics, a warning against moral blindness, lust, arrogance, clericalism and abuse of power. For others, especially younger viewers, I fear the effect will be to increase prejudice and alienate them from this community of sinners we call the Church.
I saw the film Goodbye Christopher Robin twice recently and think it's brilliant. Domhnall Gleeson is so good in everything he does. Prayers figure a few times in a very positive and endearing way in the early stages as the young 'Christopher Robin/Billy Moon' says prayers at his bedside. Faith doesn't play much of a role other than that, even in times of crisis, but the film is full of warm humanity without being mushy about it. The film is about the life of A.A. Milne, author of the Winnie the Pooh stories. Whether you love the stories or not, I think the film is endearing - the prayer scenes might be useful in RE class - maybe teasing out how childhood prayers could become mature adult prayers, rather than being left behind.
14/12/17 It was a treat earlier in the week to see the new film in the Star Wars series. Star Wars: The Last Jedi has some eyer popping moments, and while many popular characters return (especially Luke Skywalker, played by Mark Hamill) there are many fresh elements in the plot and visuals - including the scenes shot in Iceland - the red and white motif is particularly striking. Of course Skellig Michael in Kerry figures large and those sweeping aerial shots make it look hugely impressive. Little did the monks of early Christian Ireland think their secluded location would become so popular. The fictional place is described as being one of the remotest places in the galaxy! The beehive huts are central, and there are ancient texts, though I think it's the first time that Jedi is referred to as a religion in the films. I'm open to correction on that. And I realise that some people today declare themselves Jedi when asked about their religion! Commentators have often drawn parallels between religion and 'The Force', though it seems more Buddhist or New Age than Christian. One of the rebels (the good guys!) at one stage says 'God speed' as others leave on a dangerous mission, but this isn't explored further. The universal struggle between good and evil is is noteworthy throughout - evil is clearly recognised for what it is - and the process of temptation is intensely played out in the character of Kylo Ren (Adam Driver) - some ket temptation scenes might be useful for RE.. It was good to see the late Carrie Fisher still in the role of Princess Leia, but a pity that she's not around for the release.
The film The Lady in the Van turned up on BBC 2 last Saturday - my expectations were low but I really enjoyed it. And I was pleasantly surprised by the faith content, which I wasn't expecting. The film tells the story of Miss Shepherd, a homeless lady who parks her van in the driveway of writer Alan Bennett and stays for years. It's a warm human story about unusual relationships. Bennett claims he put up with her out of laziness but I suspect he is just being modest. I also liked the way the story is populated by quirky secondary characters, most of whom are kind to the lady, apart from the ex-policeman who blackmails her periodically. He manipulates the burden of guilt that she carries - relating to a traffic accident from the past. This guilt haunts her and she seems to be a regular at Confession over the matter, though in a new Confession scene for my collection the priest assures her that absolution doesn't expire! She had spent some time in a convent and the nuns don't come out of that too well, reinforcing some negative stereotypes, but I don't think the film is bashing religion. Bennett's homosexuality is obvious and portrayed sympathetically but treated subtly. And I loved the way he has two personas, both well played by Alex Jennings, so that we get an insight into his inner debates and conflicts. As usual Maggie Smith in the title role makes excellent acting look effortless.
I really enjoyed the film Love and Friendship which I rented online a few nights ago. It is based on a lesser known Jane Austen novel, Lady Susan, and was filmed in Ireland. Lady Susan herself, well played by Kate Beckinsdale, is a thoroughly unlikeable character - manipulative, cynical and not very loving towards her daughter, but the joy of the film is its wit and irony, and its barbed social commentary. Religion figured here and there ... there's some funny confusion over the fourth commandment, the obligations of which commandment are teased out several times. There's a young clergyman who is quite enthusiastic but not very intuitive - Lady Susan's daughter comes to him for advice, but gets a learned sermon instead. Mind you he's not as silly as Rev Mr Collins in Austen's Pride and Prejudice. I'd love to see it soon again as there's quite an array of characters and sub plots, mostly based around relationships, so on a second viewing things might make more sense, especially in the opening scenes.
15/12/16 Review of Silence
I was lucky enough to get to the Irish premier of Martin Scorcese's new film Silence a few nights ago. It was quite a challenging experience and I'm still conflicted about it. In writing about it I must be constrained as I must do my best to avoid spoilers.
It's great to see such a highly regarded Hollywood director taking such a deep and serious interest in religion. I doubt it will be a huge commercial success, so I reckon it must be a labour of love. It seems Scorcese has been dedicated to the project for quite some time. Based on the novel by Shûsaku Endô the film tells the story of Jesuit missionaries to Japan in the 17th Century, when many were martyred and some renounced their faith.
There was much to be admired about the film – the cinematography was superb, right from the misty and moody beginning which portrayed a gruesome martyrdom, with the lush greenery and hilly landscapes of Taiwan standing in for Japan. The acting was excellent, especially from Liam Neeson as a Jesuit who has allegedly gone native and Andrew Garfield as a young priest on a mission to find him. Though nearly 3 hours long I found it absorbing throughout, whether in the action scenes (quite violent) or in the more talky scenes where varying approaches to life, religion, culture and universal truths are teased out. Some characters display an intensity of faith and willingness for self-sacrifice that will leave many in a modern audience scratching their heads, mystified. There are deep conflicts between courage, compromise and cowardice – to say these conflicts are thought provoking is putting it mildly. Much of the action is filtered through the Garfield character, whose faith is sorely put to the test.
Trying to discern the overall point of view of the film isn't easy, and maybe it's deliberately so. I didn't find the overall impact uplifting though it was certainly inspiring at times and challenging throughout. The attitude to religion I found ambiguous, and I suspect that Christians, Buddhists and non-believers alike will all find something to lift them and something to cast them down. The ambiguity was there right to the end. What's not ambiguous is the reality of human weakness, especially in the face of tortuous dilemmas. In some respects it seems to show martyrdom in a poor light, and yet one could also find admiration for the courage of martyrs. There was little ambiguity in the matter of religious intolerance – the suffering inflicted on the local Catholics and the visiting priests came across as a thorough indictment, with plenty of resonance for modern times. I felt that the motivation of the local political figures in seeking to crush Christianity could have been clearer.
There are negatives. I though the inclusion of the 'voice of God' in a few instances was rather random and presumptuous, even if it was possibly in the mind of one of priests. The cruelty portrayed was intense throughout, and some will find it overly graphic. For the most part the best lines and prominence are given to priests who renounce their faith while those who don't are under-developed as characters. No doubt the director found their struggles the most interesting and complex. It is worth noting that those who renounce their Catholic faith seem spiritless after that but were passionate and energetic before it.
At times I thought this was a truly unique film, and in many ways it is. But then I was frequently reminded of other films – The Passion of the Christ (extreme violence in an artistic religious film), A Man For All Seasons (martyrdom, conscience v state), Apocalypse Now (seeking a prominent figure who has gone rogue), The Mission (historical, cultural differences, epic sweep). There were plenty of Biblical parallels, especially linking the sufferings of the priests to the Passion of Christ. For example, in a Palm Sunday moment, though reversed somewhat, the Garfield character (who looks like traditional images of Christ at this stage) arrives into a town on horseback (or was it a donkey?) a prisoner reviled by the people. There are resonances of Gethsemane and several crucifixion motifs. At one point the Garfield character is accused of arrogance for relating his sufferings to those of Christ.
As regards educational use I'd be doubtful. Apart from the length of it, the vicious cruelty, torture and graphic killings are a big problem for school use. As regards faith I suspect young people might just find it weird, and it could as easily shake their faith as nourish it. At the very least it's a film for those of mature and firm faith. Plenty of background information and context would be needed beforehand and a lot of guided discussion afterwards. That being said individual clips might be useful – for example there's a striking scene of Eucharist and quite a few Confession scenes, including several featuring a Japanese man who confesses the same sin of apostasy several times, is always sincere and always sins again – to the point of these scenes acting as comic relief.
My reactions to the film are still in a state of flux, so I may revisit!
7/5/16 During the week I finally got to see the film Sing Street, having heard it praised widely. In a way it's a well worn plot, with young people starting a rock band (this time in 80's Dublin) - reminiscent of The Commitments, School of Rock and That Thing You Do. In fact there's even a nod to Romeo and Juliet. On the plus side it was very funny in spots, especially in the early stages, as the students assemble the band and find their musical identity. Teachers will find lots to laugh at and even some stuff to shiver at as the students get up to mischief, not all of it a matter of harmless larks. Bullying and domestic discord also darken the mood. The original music is excellent as well, and lead actor Ferdia Walsh-Peelo, effectively subtle in his role as Cosmo, does all his own singing. However there is an element of Catholic bashing and some lazy stereotyping of Christian Brothers (the film is set in Synge St!), which spoils the overall good-humoured nature of the proceedings. Yes, teachers can be bullies as well as students, but tarring a whole group with the same brush wouldn't be tolerated in other circles. I won't include a spoiler but I found the ending rather weak and stretching credulity.
People (Koreans in this case) encountering racist attitudes was central to the plot of the film Gran Torino, shown on TV 3, last Sunday night. I was never a fan of Clint Eastwood’s macho anti-heroes from his early days, but he has matured wonderfully as an actor and director – he filled both roles with distinction for this film. If anything he flipped his usual persona this time, especially towards the end, but to say more on that front would be too much of a spoiler!
One engaging plot strand had the Eastwood character, Walt, in an ongoing skirmish with the young local priest who promised his now deceased wife that he’d try to get Clint back to the Church. This culminated in a touching and funny Confession scene – the priest, suspicious of Walt's motives, expected some atrocity from Walt’s time in Vietnam, but what Walt was most worried about was kissing another woman at a Christmas party, short changing another person in a deal over a boat and not knowing his sons well enough.
Watched plenty of films and TV dramas over the holiday period. Finally caught up with the film Gravity, with George Clooney and Sandra Bullock.
Eye-popping visuals and a tense storyline, and I was surprised to find some faith elements. At one stage, on a Russian space station attention is given to what looks like an icon of St Christopher carry the baby Jesus, and later in a crisis Bullock's character expresses regret that no-one taught her how to pray.
got to see the film Selma last night and it was certainly worth
the trip. David Oyelowo was excellent as Martin Luther King and even better
was Carmen Ejogo as his wife Corettta. Their relationship was one of the
most interesting aspects of the film, but it wasn't thoroughly developed...
things were more hinted at and the actors, especially Ejogo, conveyed
the emotional subtleties really well.
The film seemed to accept to some extent the stories of King's womanising
tendencies, while at the same time hinting at FBI plots to discredit him.
King came across as confident and sure footed in public, but conflicted
in private, as he tried to steer a non-violent path on the way to getting
for black people vindication of their right to vote - the right was there
in Alabama, but country officials threw so many obstacles in the way of
registration that it was practically impossible.
The filmmakers were wise to concentrate on this one particular phase of
King's life, culminating in the famous civil rights march from Selma to
Montgomery. The first effort to cross the iconic bridge in Selma was met
by brute force on the part of the police and that is conveyed in an effective
but quite frightening way. Moments like these are unbearably tense and
necessarily violent, but at least our sympathies were with the victims
and not the perpetrators.
Conflicts within the movement were acknowledged and highlighted which
guards against the film being overly sentimental, though there's an understandably
triumphal mood at the end.
Religious faith is prominent in the film and sympathetically presented.
King, a pastor, is obviously motivated by his faith, as are many of his
supporters. At the march, supportive priests, ministers and nuns are very
much in evidence. I thought some early scenes were a tad lethargic and
overly talky which would make classroom use of the full film tough going,
and with hints of King's affairs and a little bad language it mightn't
be appropriate for juniors anyway.
Overall I found it an inspiring and moving film and can see plenty of
opportunities for school use, especially using clips, in teaching themes
like human dignity, justice, politics and faith, courage, maturity of
conscience and more. Suitable scenes include one, early on, where a black
woman, played by Oprah Winfrey, is thwarted in her efforts to register
for voting. Any of King's speech scenes are excellent, including an early
one on the importance of the right to vote. The attack on the first march
will hold the attention of any class and encourage a strong sense of injustice,
though the violence is rather strong. There's a useful scene as well at
the second march where King leads the crowd in a silent prayer.
Another 'Resource of the Day' to highlight - this time I've chosen
this supper scene from the wonderful film 'Of Gods and Men'. It
comes near enough to the end of the film when the monks who are under
threat from insurgents in North Africa. They have decided, despite the
danger, to stay on and serve the local community, largely Muslim. The
film has many wonderful moments suitable for classes dealing with inter-faith
relations, sense of community, the religious life, ritual and more, but
this scene is particularly powerful, especially if you have watched the
film up to this point so that you know the characters involved. Not a
word is spoken, but the scene is beautiful and emotional. The parallels
with the Last Supper are clear, and this clip is a wonderful resource
for classes on table fellowship. My study guide to the full film is here.
Today's 'Resource of the Day' is a link to Decent
Films, a film reviewing website that takes a faith perspective
into account. The writer, Steven D. Greydanus, has written for many American
catholic publications. His reviews are detailed and perceptive and should
help any RE teacher looking for suitable films for the classroom. Maybe
I'm calling him perceptive because I agree with most of what he writes!
For example there's his recent review of Calvary (here),
the best I've read so far, and also of Noah (here).
Going back to 2003 I liked his review of Bruce Almighty (here)
, often used in RE when studying images of God.
Yesterday I highlighted the last interrogation scene from Sophie
Scholl: The Final Days, definitely my favourite film for RE.
The film tells the true story of Sophie Scholl, a young woman and
marvellous role model who campaigned against the Nazis in Munich in the
early 1940's. The film packs a powerful punch, and this scene is one of
the most useful for RE - touching on themes of racism, conscience, discrimination
and more. If you start with this scene you may be persuaded to continue
... shortly after there is a very intense trial scene (the ranting Nazi
judge was just like that in real life). As for the ending ....
Still catching up. This week I've been attending events for the Ecumenical
Bible Week. In particular there are presentations on the Bible
and Film and the Bible and Music. On Monday I got to the
film presentation in the Presbyterian Church in Arklow and it an excellent
night. David Shepherd, Assistant Professor of Hebrew/Old Testament in
the Loyola Institute and Trinity College, explored many aspects of the
Bible and film, focussing especially on the recent film Noah and
what director Darren Aronofsky intended. He reflected on the biblical
and non-biblical aspects and had plenty of clips to illustrate the point.
He also looked at Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ especially
the portrayal of the non-scriptural Veronica, and where her story might
have originated. He related this to a much earlier portrayal of her in
a film by French director Alice Guy Blaché, who started making
films in 1896 and died in 1968!
have mixed views about the film Calvary and I suspect it will polarise
audiences. It has quite a bit going for it, but many downsides as well,
a bit like the flawed humanity it portrays.
Brendan Gleeson gives a powerhouse performance as a priest in the West
of Ireland who is told in the opening confession scene that he will be
murdered in a week. The rest of the film develops as a sort of countdown
to that fateful Sunday on a local beach. Gleeson's Father Lavelle is portrayed
as a good man, surrounded mostly by crude and/or vain locals. He goes
about his priestly work with empathy and care for his parishioners and
we also see him saying Mass and hearing confessions. There's little of
the support structures that priests usually have in a parish, and most
of the surrounding characters are quite off-putting from the dodgy guard
to the drunken businessman living in the big house and the foul-mouthed
It's an interesting twist that the priest was previously married and has
a troubled daughter. She felt that by joining the priesthood after his
wife died he had left her with two parents lost to her. She is one of
the few sympathetic characters as is the American writer that the priest
supplies with provisions. There is some good-natured fun between the priest
and a canny altar boy. There are lots of anti-Catholic jibes, especially
about paedophile priests, which is a prominent theme, but one could argue
that these come from the obnoxious characters and therefore may not form
part of the viewpoint of the film.It's
not only these elements that that makes the film fit only for mature audiences.
The language is frequently though not relentlessly crude and some of the
violence is graphic. Suicide is also a strong theme. In its favour Gleeson's
performance is a standout, eliciting our sympathy for this good but troubled
Themes of forgiveness and redemption are woven into the plot and if anything
the film has a very favourable view of the work of a priest, and there
are harsh words for his fellow priest who is not very dedicated to the
work, though he is a bit of a cliché - I've seen so many dramas where
a passionate priest was paired with a wimp of one sort or another. I felt
that some of the worthy themes were handled in bite-sized snippets and
that the treatment often lacked depth.
Due to the adult content I don't see a lot of use for this film in RE
for young people. The confession scene at the start is too crude, but
there's a beautiful sequence where the priest anoints a foreigner who
has been fatally injured in a car crash, and consoles his wife immediately
afterwards. The local doctor's cynicism seems all the more ugly in this
light. The forgiveness theme is highlighted in two matching phone call
scenes near the end, both involving the daughter, but without context
these scenes, especially the latter, won't make much sense.
There are clichéd and melodramatic scenes (e.g. the pub shoot up) contrasted
with some beautifully filmed scenery, making for an interesting but unsatisfying
whole. It's heart is in the right place but a dose of subtlety wouldn't
have gone astray.
last Friday's God Slot (RTE Radio 1) had Barry McMillan's perceptive
review of the film. He seemed to like it, especially its message of mercy
and respect, but called it 'relentlessly odd', 'quite mad' and a 'spectacular
grand folly'. He thought the film adhered to the spirit of the original
text in Genesis, even if some odd unusual elements were added.
to see the film Noahtonight, and so these are first impressions.
I may add more later, after 'mature reflection'.
Well first of all the good stuff. Noah is an impressive film on
many levels. Sometimes the visuals are poetic and the special effects
dramatic. The acting in the main roles is excellent. Russell Crowe seems
able to bring a striking humanity to epic roles (eg Master and Commander,
Gladiator), Anthony Hopkins dominates his scenes as Noah's Grandfather,
Jennifer Connelly is convincing as Noah's wife though she doesn't seem
to age as much he does! Emma Watson is fine as an adopted daughter though
the characters of Noah's sons are underdeveloped.
There are two sequences that RE teachers may find particularly useful
- a poetic creation sequence as Noah tells the story to his children,
and the beautiful rainbow event near the end. This ultimately gives the
film a sense of hope and optimism that was absent from much of the film.
The bleakness is because Noah is convinced that God, referred to throughout
as 'The Creator', is punishing all of humanity and is just going to save
the 'innocent' animals, using Noah as his vehicle. At times it seems that
director Darren Aronofsky is pushing a trendy environmentalist line, a
bit like the way the Noah story is treated in Evan Almighty. But
it's not that simple, as faith and hope in a loving humanity is restored,
a humanity that hopefully will have respect for creation.
The film takes major liberties with the Genesis story, the most bizarre
aspect being the 'Watchers', a bunch of giant rock creatures that are
reminiscent of the walking tree creatures (The Ents) in the Lord of
the Rings films. It turns out that these are angels that The Creator
is punishing for siding with human beings and trying to help them. They
protect Noah from other humans who want to be taken on to the Ark and
a great big battle scene ensues, a field day for the CGI artists! The
Ark itself is more like a fortress, all square shaped and ugly, looking
like something that couldn't possibly float. The deluge is spectacular
when it comes, not just rain but geysers rising from the earth and the
scenes of people drowning are quite distressing. That, the strong violence
and a brief suggestive scene rule out the very young.
film drags a bit after that, complete with sub-plot about an evil stowaway!
The film teases out issues of good and evil, love, discerning the will
of God, temptation, choice and free will, and in that way is a cut above
many current films.
that one of my favourite films The Execution of Private Slovikis now available on DVD (e.g. here
at Amazon). This is a 1974 TV movie starring Martin Sheen in the true
story of Eddie Slovik, the only US soldier executed for desertion in World
War 2. Have ordered it from Amazon, but I did get to see it again few
years ago and here's what I wrote at the time: 'It was simple basic and
hard hitting, and as moving as ever. It
is not in the least heavy handed in it's message, and some viewers may
even find Slovik a somewhat unsympathetic character. Two
scenes in particular are useful for class - around the middle of the film
the chaplain talks to the firing squad about the morality of it all, and
towards the end there is Slovik's final experience of the Sacrament of
Reconciliation. He prays on the way to execution, but this scene is tough
going and may not be suitable for younger classes at least. And without
the context of the full film the emotional impact wouldn't be the same.
caught up with the film Stella Days last night. I was well disposed
towards it, being a fan of Martin Sheen, but though it has its good points
I found it hard to warm to. Clichés abound in yet another of these awful-Ireland-of-the-past
films. The storyline has Fr Barry (Sheen) starting up a cinema in Borrisokane,
out off his love for the art form but also to raise funds for a new Church
he's not too enthusiastic about. Predictably the cardboard cut-out cranky
old bishop (Tom Hickey, in an unsubtle performance) is against it on moral
grounds (the filth!) until he sees the money being raked in by other cinemas.
Even more opposed is the local politician, right wing Catholic of course
(one-note surly acting from Stephen Rea).
In a way there are too many plots, many of them predictable, for any of
them to be handled with any depth - the story of Fr Barry's vocation,
whisked away to seminary at age 12, the handsome new teacher who falls
for the lonely abandoned wife, the young boy waiting for his father to
come home from England, the EBS woman promoting rural electrification,
the old lady whose faith is dodgy but who thrives on multiple anointings.
The verdict isn't all bad however. Martin Sheen brings a certain warmth
to his role that is largely absent from the rest of the film. We can empathise
with his efforts to live out a vocation he may never have had, and yet
see the vanity that motivates to want to get back to the academic life
in Rome. I can't remember any instance of him praying, he's overly distracted
by the cinema controversy and in one scene seems unconcerned or even tacitly
approving of the adulterous relationship between the teacher and the lodger.
Yet he cares for and is kind to his people without in any way trying to
lord it over them as the politician and the bishop would like him to do.
They're big on control while he wants to be of service.
Though largely dark in mood, the films tries hard at the start to be whimsical,
with a pleasantly light-hearted music score and some entertaining confession
scenes to add to my collection - most of the time it's people confessing
that they've taken the Lord's name in vain. We see him performing several
of the Sacraments, for the most part treated respectfully, though one
scene seemed to suggest that the new electric cookers were 'magic' like
the Eucharist. I couldn't see myself using the full film in class, but
the confession scenes might be useful.
I saw the Oscar winning Mystic River for the first time during
the holidays and was impressed. It's rough, with lots of F-Words, fairly
strong violence and a child abuse theme, but none of this is gratuitous
and the film is superbly directed by Eastwood (he doesn't star) and the
acting is top-notch as would be expected from the likes of Sean Penn,
Tim Robbins, Kevin Baco and Laura Linney. It's a murder story with an
absorbing plot, but is full of humanity. There's a religious background
in that many characters are Irish Americans, and there's a First Communion
the film Nativity! for the first time - it stars Martin Freeman
as a teacher in a Catholic Primary School in England who is reluctanly
persuaded to take on the school nativity play. I don't think it's a classic,
and teachers will find some unrealistic elements (e.g. a teacher taking
two pupils to Los Angeles under the impression that parents had
signed permissions!), but it's good natured and amusing, with some touching
scenes. The final nativity play is more than a tad over the top, but there's
no denying the feel-good atmosphere.
night I went to see Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers in the O2
in Dublin - it was on a giant screen with full orchestra and choirs onstage
providing a live soundtrack. As you got absorbed in the film it was easy
to forget that the music was live, and every now and then I looked at
the musicians and singers to remind myself that they were present - might
have been easier to be aware of that if I hadn't been so far back in the
venue! I was reminded of how the scenes with Gollum/Smeagol so well captured
the conflict between good and evil in all of us - thiough normally it's
not so dramatic. There are several scenes where this character, so damaged
by his pursuit of earthly power symbolised by the Ring, engages in this
inner conflict, torn between being loyal to the good Hobbits and wanting
to kill them for selfish reasons.
night I finally got to see the film Gran Torino, where Clint Eastwood
plays an irascible old racist in conflict with local immigrants. There's
quite a bit of foul and racist language so I can't see myself using it
in school, but there's a interesting young priest in the story. He promised
the Eastwood character's wife who has just died that will keep an eye
on Walt and try to get him to Confession. Needless to say Grumpy old Walt
resists. The priest is young, and perhaps naieve (Walt didn't have much
time for his funeral oration) but he does persist and both of them learn
a lot about life and death. The scenes between them are quite entertaining
and thought provoking. Ultimately there's a touching and funny Confession
scene - another worthy addition to my collection of Confession scenes!
of the best films I saw during the holidays was Doubt , starring
Meryl Streep as a school principal and nun who must deal with the suspicion
that the school chaplain, played by Philip Seymour Hoffman is conducting
an inappropriate relationship with a student. It is set in the early 1960's
and the period flavour is well conveyed. The acting is excellent as would
be expected of Streep and Hoffman, and the script by John Patrick Shanley
has a sharpness and intelligence that is rare in mainstream cinema. The
controversial issue of abuse is handled subtly and with restraint, and
I didn't sense any hidden agendas or axe-grinding. One could raise issues
- e.g. why does no-one seem to question the child? Is the mother's attitude
credible? Yet in the context of the time and within the world of the film
it was believable. As regards school use, I'd be hesitant. There is a
useful scene where the priest gives a strong sermon on the damaging effects
of gossip, but I think the film is best suited to a mature audience. For
very young students it might just
reinforce the paedophile priest stereotype, and they mightn't get the
30/8/11 The Courageous Heart of Irena Sendler, a film shown on RTE
in the early hours of last Thursday, told the inspiring and true story
of a Catholic social worker in Nazi-occupied Warsaw who smuggled Jewish
children out of the ghetto to save them from deportation to extermination
camps. Anna Paquin, a former child actor who has made a fine transition
into adult roles, played Sendler, and was the emotional heart of the film.
While it lacked the dramatic intensity of Polanski's The Pianist,
one thing the film did well was to show the internal conflicts among the
Jews about whether they should let their children be looked after by Polish
families who would pretend the children were Catholic. Some couldn't let
go emotionally, some couldn't believe that the cultured Germans could
plan such a fate for the Jews, some feared their children might be converted,
though Sendler stressed that this wasn't her intention.
Though it was somewhat slow in developing the story in the early stages,
there were some heart-rending moments, especially when children were separated
from their parents, even to save them. There was an especially unsettling
scene as children were rounded up from the ghetto orphanages - they went
off singing as they thought they were going to a better place. The bleak
faces of the adults and Sendler's frustration told a different story.
atrocities were not that graphically portrayed, though the atmosphere
of fear was well conveyed. The worst sequence was the interrogation of
Sendler by the Gestapo.
As for specifically religious content, it was unobtrusive. The local priest
was seen helping Sendler, convents were seen to be hiding Jewish children,
was shown to the Jewish tradition - there was no intention to convert
the children, and Sendler kept records so that the children could, if
possible, be reunited with their own families after the war.
Scenes that would be useful in class include a Seder meal, a family discussion
on whether the children should be hidden with Christian families, an early
scene where some of Sendler's co-workers can't bring themselves to help
the Jews because of prejudice (see clip above, which also features other
useful scenes). A
Jewish community scene also discusses the issue of what to do with the
children and raises the difficult of lying to stay alive e.g. documents
are forged, Jewish children pretend to be Christian by learning to bless
themselves and say Christian prayers - mental reservation anyone?
As the film ends there's a touching addition where the real Sendler speaks
about the Jewish mothers who gave
up their children and the Christian mothers who risked their lives to
save them. She died in 2008 at the age of 98!
For more information on Irena Sendler, including educational resources,
go here: http://www.irenasendler.com/
12/7/11 The Tree
of Life: director Terrence Malick specialises in reflective storylines,
interesting characters and stunning visuals. The Tree of Life includes
all these but the emphasis is not so much on plot this time, which makes
for challenging viewing. It's a long film (about 2 hours 20 mins), it's
episodic like a series of memories, the timeline isn't chronological,
the viewer will have to work hard to make sense of it at times, but I'd
say the patient, reflective viewer will find it rewarding. The plot, which
is only one aspect of this complex film, concerns a family in USA in the
1950's - the father (Brad Pitt) loves his wife (Jessica Chastain) and
children but is gruff and rather domineering. This causes problems for
his three sons, one of whom, Jack (Sean Penn) we see in his later adult
life, trying to find meaning. The film was most appealing to me in the
family life scenes, but these scenes are just fragments, only sometimes
approaching "normal" film style.
The acting throughout was superb - Pitt can be both appealing and off-putting
as the father, Chastain is the moral and emotional core of the film as
the mother, Sean Penn doesn't have a lot to do, while the child actors
are excellent, especially Hunter McCracken as the young Jack.
The visuals are beautiful - the camera lingers lovingly (boringly, I'm
sure some will say!) on water, skyscapes, sunflowers. These visuals are
accompanied subtly by light classical music, and overall the clarity of
the picture is exceptional - see it on Blu-Ray when it comes out on DVD!
There is a strong faith element, but it's more reflective than preachy.
The Book of Job figures strongly (the film starts with a quote
from the book) and a variety of prayers and scriptural quotations graces
the film. Some of the background music is religious as well - e.g. there's
a striking Agnus Dei at a particularly significant moment.
Big meaning of life questions are raised and answers are only hinted at.
The issue of human suffering is tackled, mainly through the efforts of
Jack to make sense of what he has learned about God and the world. The
father is a religious man, but it seems too much on the surface, while
with the mother it's a more internal thing. Her opening voiceover (clip
above), on what she has learned about the difference between nature and
grace is crucial to an understanding of the film's themes.
Needless to say I was wondering how this might be used in school. Certainly
I can't see myself showing the full film - I'd suspect students might
mitch to avoid it! But there are some useful clips - e.g. the opening
voiceover of the mother, a scene where young Jack is praying, a sermon
in church, a scene near the end that may be a representation of Heaven.
One could fault the film for its perfunctory plot, its overuse of lingering
pretty pictures, its excessive length,. Some critics have accused it of
being ponderous and pretentious (which I wouldn't agree with). Yet it
gives the impression that it was well thought out and that everything
is the way it is for a good reason. The one thing I'd be less inclined
to make allowances for is the difficulty at times of making out what the
characters are saying - what with the regional accents and the mumbling
and whispering. There's little enough dialogue, so I would have thought
it should be clearer. I'd be inclined to activate the subtitles when I
get the DVD.
The more I think about the film the more I find I want to see it again,
and that wasn't my first reaction. I think it's one of those films that
call for a second viewing - there's just too much to take in first time
the last few days I've been showing parts of the film Sophie Scholl,
The Final Days, with 3rd Year students. (Sophie Scholl was a real
life character who campaigned against the Nazis in Germany - she was arrested
for leafletting). It fits in really well with the morality element of
the course. I even used the clip on left as past of my assessment with
the TY students. This clip is the final interrogation of Sophie, and the
script is based on transcripts of the original interrogation. One could
get several classes out of this ten-minute clip - issues raised include
conscience, the state and religion, empathy, world view, persecution of
the Jews and the mentally ill, and God. Sophie is a great role model for
young people, but even the interrogator is an interesting character. I
was glad to see the third years absorbed by this, as there's a lot of
talk, and it's subtitled.
Finally got to see The Way last night, and I wasn't disappointed.
This new film is about a father-son relationship and is set against the
background of the Camino de Santiago pilgrimage in Spain. Martin Sheen
plays the father, while his son Emilio Estevez plays the son, and also
wrote and directed.
It was quite moving, challenging and thought provoking. Gradually we get
to know the Sheen character and the motley crew he meets up with. It's
a strongly human film, and its empathy with the characters is what makes
it involving and touching. The Pilgrimage motif is of course a powerful
one - the journey through life, the baggage we carry apart from our backpacks,
the varying paths we take, the people we journey with. Estevez uses the
motif subtly enough, but may have been worried about critical reaction
as he has the Irish writer (played by James Nesbitt) revel in the "metaphor
bonanza" and yet wonder if he is being over fanciful - things may be what
they seem and no more than that. Perhaps Estevez wishes to distance himself
from having an overly religious film - at one stage a minor character
says it's not about religion at all, and stresses the point. None of the
characters makes an obvious connection with God in any way, yet the film
is imbued, in a positive way, with religion, without being heavy handed
in any way. The Sheen character prays, though at the beginning he doesn't
see the point. In a key scene the woman struggles with prayer. Churches
and religious images abound, and there are at least two positive priest
There are some fine set pieces, and such scenes may well be useful in
RE, though the full film is probably too long and leisurely for youngsters.
Near the start a French policeman explains the nature of the pilgrimage,
and later, on the road, the pilgrims discuss the nature of the "true pilgrim"
(both clips useful in classes on pilgrimage). For symbolism there's a
scene at one point where the tradition is to say a prayer and leave a
stone at a particular monument (useful for ritual as well). The scene
where they arrive at the cathedral in Santiago de Compostella is really
well done, and really captures a sense of awe and wonder. Among the interesting
conversations on the road, one has a subtle pro-life message as a woman
wonders about her unborn baby. Some elements raise questions of suitability
for young viewers - in particular there's an ambiguous attitude to soft
drugs, but I think it will give mature viewers a warm glow, Many films
deal with journeys (physical and metaphorical) of self discovery but The
Way has carved out a distinctive little niche of its own.
the last few days I've been showing parts of the film Sophie Scholl,
The Final Days, with 3rd Year students. (Sophie Scholl was a real
life character who campaigned against the Nazis in Germany - she was arrested
for leafletting). It fits in really well with the morality element of
the course. I even used the clip on left as past of my assessment with
the TY students. This clip is the final interrogation of Sophie, and the
script is based on transcripts of the original interrogation. One could
get several classes out of this ten-minute clip - issues raised include
conscience, the state and religion, empathy, world view, persecution of
the Jews and the mentally ill, and God. Sophie is a great role model for
young people, but even the interrogator is an interesting character. I
was glad to see the third years absorbed by this, as there's a lot of
talk, and it's subtitled.
finally got to see the film Of Gods and Men (Des Hommes et Des
Dieux) , still drawing crowds at the Lighthouse Cinema in Smithfield,
Dublin. This tells the true story of a group of Cistercian monks under
threat from Islamist terrorists in Algeria. It's a slow moving drama but
well worth the effort to stay with it. Rarely have I seen a film with
such depth of faith and respect for its subject. It's not in the least
bit preachy or sentimental, but treats the deepest of religious themes
in an accessible but challenging way. Unless you know the historical background
very well it's entirely unpredictable - I couldn't help thinking at various
stages that Hollywood would treat it so differently, but thankfully it
avoids clichés and stereotypes.
The characters of the monks is what appeals most as they try to serve
the local Muslim population with respect and compassion. The increasing
terrorist violence in the areas puts them on edge as they grapple with
internal and external conflicts, agonising over whether they should stay
and risk all or leave to save themselves.
I couldn't see myself showing the whole film in class, because it's so
slow moving and so much requiring maturity in the viewer (there's also
a rather graphic killing), but there are several scenes that might work
well. For example, the scene where they get their first visit from the
terrorists is particular striking and tense, and features an unusual bit
of impromptu inter-faith dialogue! Later the monks sing together (as they
do regularly in the film) in an act of solidarity as a military helicopter
hovers menacingly overhead. A scene where they finally decide what to
do is also of interest, while near the end there's a touching letter from
one of the monks about the relationships between Christians and Muslims.
Several scenes show the monks in intense moments of prayer.
What remained with me most was the individuals and their relationships
- the character of each monk is portrayed beautifully, and the film stands
as a tribute to their human dignity, cameraderie, courage and faith.
The film has been held over at the Lighthouse much longer than expected
due to public demand - significant that a challenging film with religion
so central should develop such a following.
Watched the film Raising Helenlast
night and was surprised by how positive it was towards religion and how
warm towards people and good values. Kate Hudson is excellent as Helen,
a swinging party girl who must grow up fast when she has to raise her
sister's children when the sister dies. At one stage she prays that God
will find her a good school for the children and immediately passes a
Lutheran faith school - "That was quick" she says/prays. There's
a very funny scene where she pretends to the pastor (she calls him "Father
Pastor") that they are all Lutherans. The Pastor jokes that they
will have to have a blood test to prove it, but Helen doesn't get the
irony and says the kids can have no blood tests, on medical grounds. Later,
when the pastor asks her out on a date, she feels terrible that she may
have lead him away from God and his vows of celibacy - he explains that
clerical celibacy is not an issue for Lutherans!
well, back to school over a week now and exhausted. Surprised to see how
long it is since I added to the blog.
Starting off again with a review of the film Karol, A Man
Who Became Pope, shown on RTE 1 last Saturday. There's lots in it
that will be useful for RE class, and the follow up film is coming up
this Saturday afternoon.
The first film takes the story from the German invasion of Poland to Karol
becoming Pope. The central performance by Piotr Adamczyk is excellent
- thoughtful, convincing, often moving. Also impressive are Malgorzata
Bella as Hanna, a possible love interest for young student Karol, and
Raoul Bova as Fr Tomasz, a young priest and close friend of Karol. Any
scenes with any one or more of these three are intense and involving.
In fact it is in some of the set piece scenes that the film excels most.
There's one that's fraught with tension as Fr Tomasz is "invited" to hear
the confession of one particularly nasty Nazi, but storms out from the
dinner table after delivering a brave rebuke to the Germans present over
their treatment of Jews and their children in particular. Great scene
for illustrating themes like injustice and prejudice. All scenes between
Karol and Hanna are so credible, a lovely portrayal of friendship and
blossoming romantic love. The tensions between them, over how to react
to the German occupation (words or guns - useful moral dilemmas here)
and his growing discovery of his vocation (see clip above), are sensitively
but realistically handled. You can feel Karol's sense of mission, but
also Hanna's sense of loss. In fact the way his vocation is handled is
so well done that the relevant scenes would be very useful for covering
the theme of vocation in class.
Scenes of the Nazi cruelty and the persecution of the Jews are strong
and affecting. It could hardly be otherwise I suppose. After the World
War 2 scenes there's much more talk as the fortunes of the Church and
Polish culture are at the mercy of the godless communism of the Russians
and their puppet rulers, but this part is affecting too, with some strong
emotional moments, especially the forgiveness of a spy - very useful scenes
for Confession and forgiveness. I thought the film was less successful
when the talk was less concerned with interpersonal issues and more concerned
with politics and theology. It's not that I'm faulting the theology, but
at times the film was a tad preachy, trying to get important points across
with lumps of theology and morality that didn't flow as easily as dialogue
If you missed it, it's available for less than a fiver at amazon.co.uk,
and is available in segmented form on YouTube.
the film Premonition on RTE 1 last night. Sandra Bullock played
a married woman who has premonitions of her husband's death. It was quite
a rivetting thriller with all sorts of timeshifting twists and turns.
It raised some interesting issues about love, relationships and what's
important in life. At one stage the Bullock character visits a priest
to get some guidance - it's an intersting exchange, about two thirds of
the way through. He suggests that faithless people leave a vacuum in their
lives that other forces may then occupy, and that it's important to know
what's really important in your life and to fight for that.
Last Friday to celebrate the school holidays I got to the cinema
to see The Blind Side - the film that won a Best Actress award
this year for Sandra Bullock. It tells the true story of a black teenager,
uniquely skilled at American football, adopted into a white family. It
was moving, uplifting and absorbing, though overlong and certainly sentimental.
There's a faith dimension, but it's not too preachy. Bullock does a great
job playing the mother of the adoptive family, a gutsy Christian woman
who opens her home to the homeless boy, who is enrolled into a private
Christian college. When the authorities there are reluctant, considering
the boy's background, one character suggests that the word "Christian"
on the school's sign should be painted over or taken seriously. A challenge
to all our Christian schools.
Themes of racism and family conflict are touched on subtly, but there
are no huge conflicts. This makes the film less intense, but more gentle,
and it's certainly imbued with a respect and love for its characters -
at the end we get to see footage of the real life characters the film
is based on.
This family is certainly well off (huge house!), and while their material
wealth isn't questioned there is an empathy for those who are poorer,
e.g. in Bullock's visit to the boy's birth mother.
Maybe I'd like it to have been a little rougher around the edges. Is the
family too sweet to be wholesome? Perhaps, but it was good for a change
not to have the family members having clichéd rows just for dramatic
effect. It was certainly believable.
On Monday last I got to see the Irish Premier of the film Lourdes,
shown as part of the Jameson Dublin International Film Festival. It tells
the story of a young woman, almost paralysed with MS, who visits Lourdes
with a pilgrimage group, helped by Order of Malta volunteers. It's a hard one to review as I have conflicted feelings
about it. It certainly held the attention throughout its ninety or so
minutes, even though for much of it there was nothing dramatic going on.
I found it completely unpredictable, which helped, and I suppose because
it was subtitled I had to concentrate all the more. The characters were
ordinary, but still interesting. Sylvie Testud as the main character Christine
was superb - the whole thing might have collapsed without such an intriguing
performance. She managed to capture a whole range of emotions - sadness,
anger, enthusiasm, loneliness - and yet there were times she was inscrutable.
The location work at Lourdes captured the atmosphere really well, in fact
at times it had a documentary feel to it. But it was difficult to figure
out what the viewpoint of the film was. Yes there were possible miracles,
lots of prayer and devotion, and the main character, despite her suffering
was at least open to faith. But ultimately it seemed like an agnostic's
view of the Lourdes experience (and here I'm not making any assumptions
about writer-director Jessica Haussner, except that she's highly talented).
I felt the film lacked warmth towards faith, and I didn't feel any sense
of relationship with Our Lady or Jesus. It's as if Haussner was saying:
here's what might happen on an average pilgrimage to Lourdes - what do
you make of it?
And yet it wasn't entirely objective or dispassionate. There was a quiet
empathy with the invalids, especially as so many little cruelties were
shown to them - e.g. when Cécile, the chief nurse announces that there
will be an outing next day, but that those in wheelchairs would have to
stay behind. The carers do their job, often with a smile, but too often
they are more interested in flirting with each other - believable but
unsettling. "We are not here to have fun", says the irritating chief nurse,
and sure enough there is little enough of it. Everything is just a bit
too slow moving and uninspiring.
The pilgrimage chaplain is a very average priest, mostly OK with the pilgrims,
but his answers to their deep questions smack too much of platitude. The
other pilgrims are a mixed bunch, from devotional to cynical. The chief
nurse is all smiles and efficiency, not too likeable, but then she is
shown to have her own suffering. The chief Order of Malta man attracts
the eyes of all the ladies, including the main character, but he too,
ultimately, seems hollow.
Talking to some people after the film confirmed what I suspected, that
people will have wildly different assessments of the film. Maybe this
lack of a clear stance will charm some and disconcert others, but while
I did find it riveting, sometimes funny, and even quite hopeful at times,
I thought the final impression it left was on the bleak side.
For that reason I wouldn't be rushing to show it in school, though there
was one interesting Confession scene with the main character and the chaplain,
where she calmly confesses her anger. I like collecting Confession scenes
from film and TV drama, and this will be a worthy addition.
night I got a chance to see one of the first Irish screenings of a new
feature film about the appearances of Our Lady of Fatima.
The 13th Day was written and directed by Ian and Dominic
Higgins. It's great to see Catholic filmmakers turning their talents to
spiritual matters in such a creative and imaginative way. Visually the
film is a treat - it's not surprising that the Higgins brothers come from
an artistic background. Each frame of the film would make for a beautiful
still picture - mostly it's black and white, with colour being used when
Our Lady appears and Heaven touches the earth. Watching it I was reminded
of arty YouTube videos, European cinema, and even The Blair Witch Project
(visual effect not content!).
It was almost surreal in its presentation, which made it quite captivating
at times. The film seems to tell the Fatima story faithfully, framing
it by using the reminiscences of Sr Lucia as she writes her memoirs. For
me the telling of the story was somewhat episodic, always a potential
problem when filming real life events. I also felt there was too much
narration and not enough dialogue given to the actors which made it difficult
for them to really inhabit their roles. That being said the girl who played
the young Lucia, Filipa Fernandez, had a striking screen presence, crucial
when she was the central personality of the film.
One thing the filmmakers have achieved is to present this timeless story
to a modern audience in an idiom they can understand and relate to. I
didn't find it corny or preachy or sentimental, and these are also traps
that a religious film can fall into.
As always I wondered about its use in Religious Education. There would
have to be plenty of discussion afterwards, and the teacher would want
to be well informed about the background to the Fatima story. The vision
of hell and one rather scary angel make it more suitable for secondary
students. For teachers who might like to use just an extract, the scene
of the miracle of the sun is quite striking and captures the essence of
the film. At the time of writing The 13th Day is available only on Region
1 DVD (USA).
constant repeats on RTE and Channel 4 one can get overdosed on the Simpsons,
but to be fair it takes a lot of repeating to drain the humour out of
it. Last weekend both channels showed The Simpsons Movie, and like
a lot of comedy shows transferring to the big screen it was a questionable
exercise - yes, the movie was funny, but it didn't offer much more than
a typical bunch of episodes shown back to back. As always there was an
amount of religious content - and while you might welcome films that show
religion as a common part of life (airbrushed out of most American shows)
you'd smart at the sharp barbs thrown at believers. The story began on
a Sunday morning with Homer once again grumbling about going to church
- why, he says, can't he be allowed worship God in his own way - "like
praying like hell on my death bed". He grouches about Rev Lovejoy's congregation,
"pious morons" with their "phoney baloney God". Grandpa Simpson starts
speaking in tongues about some apocalyptic event, and wouldn't you know,
it was to be an environmental disaster. The show often pokes fun at those
believers who are big into "the end times". There was one hilarious scene
when the end of the world was nigh (yet again) - the believers abandoned
the church and headed for the bar, while the drinkers rushed out of the
bar and made for the church. The sign on the church said "We Told You
While Ned Flanders was presented, as usual, as a Holy Joe, he is also
portrayed as the most human and caring of the Springfield folks - providing
such a stable father figure that Bart wants him as father instead, but
only for a while of course. Yes, its mildly crude and borderline irreverent,
but its definitely funny, and even thought provoking. And suitably for
the time that's in it, it gave an outing to the idea of "epiphany" - Homer
must get a deep insight into his selfishness or he won't be able to save
Springfield and win his family back. And was there every any doubt about
Got to have another look at the film Millions on DVD last
night. It's a film by Danny Boyle of Slumdog Millionaire fame and
features a young boy who's a moral anchor for those close to him who compromise
so easily. He tries so hard to be good, and is fascinated by the stories
of the saints, many of whom appear to him, complete with halos, in little
vignettes through the film. A big bag of money, the proceeds of a train
robbery, comes his way - he thinks it's a gift from God and wants to use
it responsibly, but finds it so hard just to give it to the poor. It's
a sweet film, but not overly sentimental, and it's imbued with a warm
attitude to religious faith. The scenes with the saints are particularly
clever and amusing. It's not for very young children as there is some
menace, complex moral issues and a one-night stand (with possibilities
for the future!) between the widowed father and a charity worker.
Recently I got to see the Irish premiere of a multi-award winning
documentary The Human Experience. Can documentaries be regarded
as art? Whatever the case, this film was well put together, and it should
prove a great resource for teachers doing classes on the search for meaning.
Unfortunately it is not available on DVD yet. It tells the story of two
young American brothers, Cliff and Jeff Azize, who are searching for meaning
in their lives. They live with the homeless in their native New York,
visit a care centre for disabled children in Lima, Peru, and visit a leper
colony in Ghana, Africa. I thought the Peru segment was the best - the
children were so positive, considering their situation. One of the things
I liked about the film was the way they let the people they visited speak
for themselves. Also, the fact that it is segmented makes it particularly
classroom friendly. There is a parallel story running through the film
- one of the brothers reflects on his own upbringing and has many issues
to confront - this culminates in an emotional reunion with his father.
There are many thought provoking quotes interspersed through the film,
which again should help in the classroom context. It's a film I'd like
to see again to make a fuller judgement. Some of the film makers were
present at the screening which was a treat. I asked about the DVD release
but was told it would be a while yet as they were working on distribution
arrangements. For the moment check out the film's website,
and watch the trailer above.
know it's unseasonal, but last night I got to attend the multimedia screening
of A Christmas Carol - this is Robert Zemeckis' new film adaptation
of the Dickens story for Disney, and what a treat it is! Those who have
seen his Polar Express will be familiar with the kind of animation
applied here - a technique of motion capture that has the characters looking
incredibly like the actors that do their voices. The effect here is immeasurably
heightened by the eye-popping 3D effects. And it's not just the occasional
gimmicky scare with something being flung at the audience - the 3D effects
are seamlessly integrated throughout and you'd wonder how you could ever
bear to watch it in 2D cinema or DVD. You seem to fly through the air
with the characters, it seems to be snowing in the cinema, and yes, occasionally
a few things appear to fly into the audience, the most delightfully disgusting
being Jacob Marley's ghostly spittle as he tries to warn Scrooge about
the consequences of leading a selfish life. The amount of detail is incredible
- we see textured wrinkles and spotty skin, which doesn't sound very appealing
but in the context it's brilliant.
The technical wizardry is jaw-droppingly impressive, but without a good
story it would ultimately leave an empty feeling. Of course, Dickens provides
a timeless and very human story of redemption at Christmas time which
is told faithfully in this adaptation. Jim Carrey plays the central role
of Scrooge with his usual zest - he savours the role, wallows in it, hams
it up at times, and yet, despite many laughs it is a very serious story
and we get to feel all of Scrooge's changing emotions. Yet, for some reason
it fell that little bit short at the emotional level, perhaps because
of the fact that the characters are animated no matter how realistic the
detail. I felt this particularly to be the case when Scrooge is given
a glimpse of the sweetheart of his youth, estranged by his over concern
with money. The emotional resonance should, I thought, have been much
stronger here. One of my favourite previous versions was the Muppet
Christmas Carol and amidst all the crazy Muppets, the real Michael
Caine did a better job at capturing the humanity of Scrooge.
The film doesn't hedge on either the frightening or the religious
elements of the story - if anything they are heightened. Smaller children
may get a legacy of nightmares from the death coach that chases Scrooge,
or the horrors of the graveyard scene where the ghost of Christmas come
lets Scrooge see what a miserable future and death he will have if he
continues with his self-centred behaviour. After a series of horrors he
finds himself dangling over a yawning grave, with his open coffin waiting
for him, and under that a hellish red glow. Then there's the horrific
appearance (video clip on left) of the ghost of Scrooge's deceased partner
Jacob Marley - he seems to have come from hell or more likely purgatory
carrying the chains he has made for himself in life (reminded me of the
first appearance of the ghost in Hamlet). And as he leaves we get
a scary vision, worthy of Dante, of many other troubled souls, tortured
by the choices they have made in life.
But it's primarily a story of redemption and salvation and so the other
religious elements are more positive, apart from a dig at "men of the
cloth" who seem responsible for Sunday closure of a place where the poor
can cook their food (reminded me of those who criticised Christ for healing
on the Sabbath). There was liberal use of traditional Christmas hymns
on the soundtrack. Sometimes it's just a hint, (Ave Maria), sometimes
more prominent (Hark the Herald Angels Sing) and sometimes quite
central (Adeste Fideles). On the end credits there's a new song,
where Adrea Bocelli takes up Tiny Tim's "God Bless us Everyone".
Christmas Carol is due in cinemas on Nov 6th - go see it! For more info
and trailers see the official
Got a chance at the weekend to see a preview of
the film Sinner, a new independent film from USA. It looked promising,
but was a real disappointment. The storyline features a middle-aged priest
(Fr Romano) who had a secret love affair in the past that he feels guilty
about. He has to share a parish with a young priest (Fr Stephen) who is
conservative but in an unpleasant way (surprise, surprise) e.g. he rails
against Vatican II liberals. Eventually Fr Romano sends him away for psychiatric
evaluation! Yes, it's a bad time to be conservative! Into this mix comes
a prostitute who preys on priests - Fr Stephen hits her - to protect his
celibacy, he says. She tries to blackmail him but Fr Romano takes a more
compassionate approach, though resists her advances. Meanwhile Fr Stephen
takes pictures to build up a case against Fr Romano with the bishop. It's
a pretty hackneyed male fantasy pot-boiler as might be obvious by now,
but perhaps something good might have been made of it. However it's ruined
by poor pacing and plotting, stereotypes and most of all by many objectionable
elements - nudity, loads of foul language and many distasteful scenes.
Happy New Year to all and best wishes to religion teachers for the new
saw loads of interesting material on TV over Christmas, hard to keep up
with it all. Watched a video of the absorbing film The Apostle,
starring Robert Duvall in a tour de force portrayal of a fiery preacher
in the Deep South of the USA. His character is intriguing if not entirely
appealing. Old style preaching is his life, but he is also a womaniser
and prone to violence, yet conscious at times of his sinfulness. After
beating up his wife's new boyfriend he has to escape and sets up a church
in a new location, making a new life for himself, but temporarily. As
I watched I wondered if I could use any of this in religion class - there's
a brief scene early on where he prays to God in his bedroom, which is
restrained enough, and a sequence where he drives around in his bus gathering
worshippers for a service. The many extended preaching sequences might
be useful as a study in cultural context, though our students might just
find it all very weird. I find they often lament the tameness in Irish
liturgical events, compared to the American style black gospel approach,
but I'd say this might cure them! Still, it's always good to see a meaty
religious film that takes its subject seriously.
Saturday night's film on RTE 2 was also very violent, sometimes excessively
so, and there was plenty of profanity and more than a few clichés, but
there was still more than a touch of humanity in Proof of Life,
a kidnap drama set in South America. It helped that the leads were played
by Russell Crowe as the rescuer/negotiator and Meg Ryan as the wife of
the victim. When religion surfaced it was indirect but respectful for
the most part There was a positive priest character - a wily Frenchman
who was formerly in the foreign legion and was also a kidnap victim -
who showed compassion and courage when trying to help the husband. Married
love was seen as valuable - though they had conflicts, the Ryan character
remained devoted to her husband, despite her growing attraction to Crowe.
just watched yet another ghost-ish story, that kept reminding me of Ghost
Town (see below). Just Like Heaven featured Reese Witherspoon
as a workaholic doctor who has a crash and ends up haunting (sort of)
the new occupant of her apartment. It's an enjoyable romantic comedy,
though not very innovative. As in Ghost Town the religious aspects of
the next life don't figure much. At one stage, in desperation, the new
tenant (Mark Ruffalo) hires an exorcist, but I thought that scene was
a little tasteless - the priest thunders away calling on the spirit to
leave the building by the power of Christ, but his ritual makes no impression
(we discover the reason later - it's not that Christ doesn't have the
power). The psychic owner of a nearby occult bookshop (another endearingly
dopey role for Jon Heder of Napoleon Dynamite fame) comes across more
appealingly than the priest, and more tuned in to the spirit world. Again
there are broad themes of love and redemption (not of a specifically religious
kind) but I can't see any major use for it in the classroom (also, it
includes some mildly unsavoury sexual elements). The right-to-die issues
surfaces, but it's not pushing any particular line. In fact, if anything,
it would nudge the audience against being over hasty in switching off
the new film Ghost Town recently and enjoyed it. It's one of those
films that deals with the next life without getting very religious about
it. The main character, played by Ricky Gervais, had a near death experience
and now sees ghosts, and they want him to do their unfinished business,
so they can "move on". Unfortunately the Gervais character is a rather
selfish type, and doesn't really like his fellow human beings, dead or
alive. It won't be everybody's cup of tea and reviews have been mixed,
but I laughed out loud at some of the more bizarre scenes and chuckled
throughout at the dry and subtle wit. I don't see much potential in it
for classroom use, unless perhaps when covering the "last things", though
I'm not sure how sound the theology is - all these ghosts hovering around
in a sort of purgatory-limbo state, with no sign of God at all. He does
get a mention - when "acts of God" are mentioned, Gervais dryly says -
"Why does he do those things?". There are broad themes like love and redemption,
and certainly belief in an afterlife, and though there are a few rude
bits there is a very strong disapproval of adultery - the main ghost (Greg
Kinnear) has to come to terms with the harm his adultery has done.
15/9/08 I wasn't expecting to use clips from Amazing Grace (see
entry for 14/9/08 below) so soon in RE class, but we doing a class on
morality and the law and predictably the question of slavery came up -
I showed the scene where Wilberforce speaks from the deck of a slave ship,
and it seemed to hold the students attention and illlustrate the point.
The clip on left is a shorter version but contains the relevant speech.
that I've survived the shock of getting back to school I'm fit to write
again. One new resource I'm going to use soon is a film I saw recently,
Amazing Grace. It tells the story on the campaign to abolish slavery
in England, focussing on the efforts of William Wilberforce to get an
anti-slavery bill through Parliament. It moves slowly, goes back and forward
in time quite a bit, but still holds the attention. There are so many
clips that could be used in religion class, and not just on slavery and
justice issues. For example there's an early sequence where Wilberforce
tries to discern his vocation in life - torn between the work of God and
his political activities. Eventually he believes he can do both by campaigning
against slavery. Other useful clips include a scene where he meets his
mentor John Newton, writer of the song Amazing Grace and a former
slave ship owner who is now haunted (metaphorically) by the ghosts of
the slaves he carried. The representation of slavery is not that graphic,
but there are descriptions in another early scene where a group of like
minded friends gather at table to discuss the issue with Wilberforce,
and later when some well off citizens are given a close quarters experience
of a slave ship. The scenes where he addresses parliament should also
be useful in holding students' attention and introducing issues.
A few films I saw recently on TV got me thinking again about religion
in the movies, and in many cases there were interesting marriage scenes
that might be useful ice breakers in class when discussing relationships
and marriage. Intolerable
Cruelty is another cracking film from the Coen brothers (their most
recent being Oscar winner No Country for Old Men). It was quite
raunchy in spots, but was a marvellous send up of American divorce culture.
Despite all the marital shenanigans the film did seem to favour real love
and lifelong commitment. Dealing as it did with marriage, it wasn't surprising
that religious imagery figured - there was one wedding scene in particular
worth mentioning. It was a garden wedding, and the priest, strumming his
guitar, approached the happy couple while singing Simon and Garfunkel
songs! Grist to the mill, I'd suspect, for those who might not be enthusiastic
about the liturgical changes of recent years. The "religious" wedding
was a more attractive proposition than a later registry office wedding
which had a Scottish theme, complete with a bagpipe version of Bridge
Over Troubled Water. Yuk! I didn't find the religious wedding imagery
in any way offensive, perhaps because there was a good humoured warmth
about the film.
wedding scene in Wedding Daze was more problematic. A third rate
made-for-tv movie, it started well I thought, as a warm tale of a father
and his three daughters, but it quickly descended into pure and irritating
corn. A triple wedding was arranged, the father delighted in the money
he was saving in not "renting" the cathedral. This time the priest didn't
turn up at all and so, as they weren't too fussy they persuaded a nearby
rabbi to do the honours! The religious sensibilities of a groom's Italian
parents were quickly overcome.
I really enjoyed The Bachelor, which starred Chris O'Donnell as
a young man with commitment issues. His miserable efforts at proposing
to his loved one were particularly hilarious. When told he must marry
by a certain deadline to inherit the family fortune and save the family
company he becomes even more desperate, leading to one of the most bizarre
wedding scenes ever (the priest is in a police car, the groom on a nearby
fire escape, and the bride sandwiched between hundreds of other brides).
And there's an earlier attempted wedding of convenience that might also
be a useful clip for R. E. class. The film is ultimately pro-marriage
and pro-commitment, but some may find the treatment of the sacrament lacking
in respect. The Catholic priest (another fine turn by James Cromwell)
seems quite willing to go along with efforts at the inheritance driven
marriage with scant regard for Church standards, but there is a touching
scene, about two thirds way through, where he has a chat with the groom
in a boat - telling how he was married with children and became a priest
late in life when his wife died - he has only the best of praise for marriage
and this helps the groom to overcome his fear of being tied down.
More troubling was the use of religious imagery in Shanghai Noon,
This was one of Jackie Chan's comedy martial arts westerns so we can't
get too worked up about it, but for no reason to do with the plot the
final shoot out took place in a church. From the statement of the crooked
Marshall Van Cleef (a good, bad, or ugly joke?) - "I'm glad to see we're
all church goers here", it smacked of disrespect. Statues were shot to
bits and we were supposed to laugh. In fact the whole church was pretty
much wrecked when the mayhem was over. Overall it was a funny film, but
it's hard to find sacrilege and desecration funny.
The religious imagery in Before and After was brief but more positive
- we saw a funeral scene with a priest comforting a woman whose daughter
had been killed - an image that's more true to life. The young man who
was the chief suspect ran away from home, but wrote to his parents, telling
them he knew they didn't pray, but asking them to pray now, for him. The
father (Liam Neeson) impulsively covered up for the son, but the mother
(Meryl Streep) was more pure of heart - she wanted to do what was right
and tell the truth, even though she was mocked for her principles and
"absolutes" - not too often you find a leading character supporting the
idea of objective and absolute truth. Not only that but the film seemed
to support that point of view - it was seen as a healthy thing for the
family to face up to the truth, even though there was a cost. The film
wasn't entirely enthusiastic to religion however - some religious bigot
harassed the family by phone when the son was a suspect (yes, I know,
there are plenty like that who give religion a bad name), and there was
a negative comment from the father about the Abraham and Isaac story,
which raised father-son issues that he thought relevant to his own situation.
Overall a thoughtful and unpredictable film.
got to see The X-Files: I Want to Believe, recently arrived in
Irish cinemas. There are lots of scenes I'd like to look back on, so perhaps
I'll revise my initial opinions when it comes out on DVD. First off, it
was great to see Mulder and Scully back in action - it's been about 6
years since the TV show ended. The film was certainly true to the spirit
of the show, though apart from the principals only one other character
reappeared. As with the TV show there were strong religious elements -
the title "I Want to Believe" says it all.
I'd say religious believers won't be entirely happy with the way religion
is presented - one of the main characters is a paedophile former priest,
still referred to as Father Joe, played with deadly earnestness by comedian
Billy Connolly, a strange but effective casting choice. Scully can't hide
her revulsion when in his presence, but at least he seems repentant. So
though, on one level, the character might be reinforcing lazy stereotypes,
he is humanised and challenges the judgementalism of Scully and the viewer.
But there is negative portrayal of other priests also - in particular
a rather cold fish at the Catholic hospital where Scully is treating a
young boy for an apparently incurable disease. At best this priest is
a fussy administrator, but the young boy says he doesn't like the way
this priest is looking at him.
The plot centres around "Father Joe" helping the police find some missing
women because he says he has been having visions. Is he in league with
the perpetrators or has God answered his prayers of repentance? Mulder
in particular wants to believe he is genuinely psychic, but Scully is
more doubtful, still conflicted about such matters, though Fr Joe describes
her as "a woman of faith". She was often thus in the series, so it seems
her character hasn't progressed much in the intervening years, and for
that matter Mulder seems driven by the same concerns as always, though
the alien theme of the so-called "mythology" episodes doesn't figure this
time. There are many discussions about faith during the film, especially
a dramatic confrontation between Scully and Fr Joe when she reluctantly
goes to seek his help - (in this scene he says of abusers that they hate
themselves and hate each other). Other discussions fall into the trap
of wordiness that was one of the faults of the TV show. These are the
scenes I'd like to see again to form a more rounded judgement.
The plot also features the stem cell research issue, and treats it in
an interesting way - Scully dabbles in it to try and save her young patient,
but the bad guys are also into it for more gruesome purposes, so it advocates
and critics alike may feel somewhat satisfied. The distinction between
adult and embryonic stem cell research doesn't figure.
For most of the X-Files series Mulder and Scully were just good
friends - this close but platonic relationship was one of the show's attractions,
but if I remember correctly there was a hint in the 9th series that the
relationship had become physical, and in this film they seem to be living
together at least some of the time. And in another sign of the times two
of the bad guys are married to each other! Have tried not to give away
too much here, but if you do go to see it be sure to stay until the end
of the credits!
(for my article
on the religious themes in the X-Files TV series click here)
to See the film Road to Perdition again last night. Tom Hanks,
excellent as always, plays Michael Sullivan, a gangster in US prohibition
times. His son Michael is curious about his work, and is shocked when
he sees his father involved in a murder. More tragedies follow as father
and son take to the highways to avoid a hired assassin. The cinematography
is beautiful, the music striking, the characterisations reflective.
gangsters are Irish Catholic in name and culture (the Sullivans say grace
before meals), but it's disconcerting to see the worst of them attending
mass looking devout. The main gangster, played by Paul Newman, goes to
Communion in one scene, but in a subsequent chat with the Sullivan character
says that one thing is sure, none of them will see Heaven. Sullivan, also
a killer, seems to agree, but thinks that his son has a chance to avoid
that particular road to perdition. Neither gangster seems interested in
changing his situation, no sign of redemption, or repentance - too much
to loose I suppose, rather like Macbeth - "I am in blood stepped in so
far that returning were as tedious as go 'oer". This scene might be worth
using in senior classes, it's about two thirds way into the film.
Like a lot of the "Catholic" gangster films they are supposedly great
family men. This is fairly true for Sullivan, but in the pursuit of revenge
he does turn down a chance escape to Ireland with his son to start a new
Nicholas Cage was in missionary territory in Lord
of War, last Thursday night's film on RTE 2. But instead of a gospel
of love he brought death to the people of the third world. Cage played
a freelance arms dealer who liked the work, not just because it made him
rich but because he was "good at it". This arrogance led to the death
of his brother, alienation from his family, separation from his wife and
child, and he still kept at it.
His religious upbringing was curious - his mother was Catholic, but his
father pretended, with great enthusiasm, to be Jewish (for immigration
reasons if I remember correctly) - in fact it was at synagogue that the
Cage character, Yuri, met his first important arms dealing contact. He
was painfully adept at rationalising, accepting no responsibility whatever
for the destruction caused by his weapons. He sold to murderous dictators
in West Africa but hid behind the weakest of platitudes - it's not our
business what they do with the weapons, someone else will do it if I don't
etc The film was marred by grauitous sex, drug abuse and the foulest of
language, a pity coming from writer director Andrew Niccol who had scripted
the subtle Truman Show, but in other ways it was moral, even to the point
of being preachy. There was little doubt that the film showed the arms
trade as hugely cynical and destructive. An Interpol agent of impeccable
integrity (well played by Ethan Hawke) tried to nail Yuri but was thwarted
by the shady military connections his adversary had made in high places.
It was here that the film became most preachy - hammering home the point
that however repulsive the arms dealers were, the super power governments
of the world were worse. And I was uneasy about the way the Yuri character
was portrayed - cool, charismatic, successful on a material level, perhaps
an attractive role model for some young or immature viewers? Just a little
close to those films that purport to be anti-war and yet seem to revel
St Stephen's Night I watched Master and Commander: The Far Side of
the World, with Russell Crowe in the lead role - it was set during
the Napoleonic Wars, as a British warship tried to track down a French
frigate. It was well directed and written (by Peter Weir), with battles
at the start and finish and lots of interesting events in between, in
many ways an old fashioned epic. The main characters were religious, but
not in any overbearing sort of way - and there are some prayers especially
as crewmen are buried near the end. Yet it is violent - including amputation
flogging for discipline and suicide. There is little questioning of the
need for war in the first place though the on-board surgeon does rebel
28/11/07 I'm currently in the middle of a module on religious themes in
film with Transition Year class. Firstly I divided them into small
groups – each group had to lists films with religious themes in various
categories – e.g. comedy, horror, serious drama, biography, and “weird”
(films about cults, dodgy faith healers etc, the movies often focus on
this aspect of religion). This was a useful 40 minutes as I could ramble
from group to group discussing the various issues that arose. I then took
feedback and filled the board with all the films named in their categories.
The next step was to show clips that would represent some of these films
and categories. I used the parting of the waters scene from The Ten
Commandments (Cecil B. de Mille version, 1956) as an example of the
old fashioned Bible epic, some scenes from Sister Act (including
the first appearance of the gospel choir) as an example of comedy, the
scene from The Field where the priest upbraids the community for
hiding a murderer (I find the film version to have an anti-clerical bent
not present in the original John B. Keane play), and the similar but more
positive scene from On the Waterfront where the priest (Karl Malden)
remonstrates more kindly with his community, also for staying deaf
and dumb about a murder) – both examples of serious drama. As an example
of “weird” I used a clip from one of my personal favourites Static,
about a collector of faulty crucifixes who believes he can tune in heaven
on his TV. The scene where he reveals his invention always holds the students’
attention. It raises interesting questions about heaven, and has echoes
of the biblical story of the Tower of Babel. It’s not everybody’s cup
of tea but I don’t find it disrespectful, and it’s certainly unpredictable.
Next, I’ll be moving on to a class or two about films on the life of Jesus.
Spiderman 3 last night and wasn’t expecting any deep themes, religious
or otherwise. But I was in for a surprise. The most overtly religious
scene was decidedly odd. Spiderman, going through a bit of an evil alter
ego experience (as you do when you’re a superhero), looked up a church,
as if longing for goodness, and perched himself on the steeple for a bit
of a think. Meanwhile inside the church, one of the villains was actually
praying to Jesus to kill Spiderman! This guy was no stereotype villain
– he was a young photographer who had let ambition lead him to do wrong
(quite a bit like Macbeth). Mind you, he was under the influence of a
parasitic alien life form, but seemed quite willing to go over to the
dark side. There was a strong message against revenge in the film (Spiderman’s
aunt warns him against the inner corruption in a scene that I might use
in class), and there is a significant redemption theme when he is reconciled
with one of his friends at the end, and when he forgives one of the villains
for unintentionally killing his uncle. I’m not sure how useful this segment
would be in class as they students mightn’t thank me for giving away the
Meanwhile, in class I’ve managed to use a good few
artistic resources. Continuing the “Images of God” classes in third year
I used clips from Oh God You Devil, with George Burns as a genial
old God – I used the scene late in the film where the main character contacts
God by phone! The Insight video Jesus B.C. has its problems but
the scene where Father Son and Holy Spirit discuss what to do with the
rebellious human race is a useful attempt (the only one I know of) to
portray the Trinity – with three actors – the Holy Spirit is portrayed
as a black woman! Martin Sheen’s portrayal of God as a cocky young man
in a white suit in the Insight video The Walls Came Tumbling Down
sparked a few interesting comments – I used the opening 10 minutes. Would
have used the scene from Bruce Almighty where Bruce meets God for
the first time (hilarious) but my copy of that has gone astray. Tomorrow
I’ll complete this module with a prayer service, which I’ll write up soon
as I’ll be using some appropriate music along with scripture readings.
The Fighting Temptations on RTE 2 Friday last - a film that centres
around a gospel choir. There's great music, but the storyline was a tad
corny and predictable - in order to get an inheritance a guy must get
the local (and useless) gospel choir into shape for a competition. Guess
what the outcome is! The film is favourably disposed to faith in a lukewarm
kind of way, though church busybodies get a lash! The main character is
a habitual liar, but he learns to be true to himself, though without any
major religious conversion. The stereotypes would make you cringe at times,
but the script is witty, and the whole thing so cheerful and upbeat that
it's easy to enjoy and hard to get annoyed at. Some of the gospel music
segments (including gospel rap - my son left the room in disgust at this
stage!) might be useful in class to illustrate the variety of religious
music, and the whole movie might make a useful example of a film with
Saw a couple of interesting films in August that might be useful in class.
Evan Almighty was something of a disappointment after Bruce
Almighty, but it wasn't a washout. The scene where Evan is persuaded
that Morgan Freeman (reprising his earlier role) is really God is useful
for "Images of God" classes, though the equivalent scene in Bruce is far
better and more focussed. Overall the film is passable entertainment,
genial and well disposed to faith, the main characters pray, and it's
less crude than Bruce. Apart from the scene already mentioned there's
an interesting exchange between God and Evan's wife when she is getting
frustrated at Evan's efforts to be a modern day Noah. The Ark scenes are
impressive enough, though the environmental message is a bit hackneyed.
I bought Saints and Soldiers in a sale after hearing some good
reviews, and it was worth it. It's a war film, set shortly after the D-Day
invasion when some American troops get caught behind enemy lines. One
of the soldiers is a religious person (a Mormon I think) and one a cynic,
leading to some interesting exchanges. There are sound human values in
the film, but it's not sentimental. The opening scenes and closing are
quite violent, but there's a lull in the middle that makes for good character
There was an appealing priest character in last Friday night's film on
RTE 1. The Runaway Bride was a sharply scripted comedy with appealing
performances by Julia Roberts and Richard Gere in the leading roles and
a rake of great supporting characters played by Joan Cusack and Paul Dooley
among others. In one scene we learned that the runaway bride had abandoned
at the altar one guy who went on to become a priest. Despite the real
hurt back then he was now quite happy in his vocation.
I've been doing religious themes in TV drama. I started with a brainstorm
from the students on what TV dramas they've seen that featured religious
themes, and among the programmes that featured in the feedback were Father
Ted, The Simpsons, Lost and Ballykissangel. I then showed some
relevant clips, which were spread over two double classes. These are clips
I have built up over the years and keep adding to, though not as diligently
as before. Hard to find the time. I don't like using too many old clips,
so I was glad to be able to show a clip from an episode of Lost
which been on a few days previously - this was a scene where the Hurley
character had prayed for enlightenment and got it. I also used a few earlier
Lost clips - including the scene where Claire and her baby are baptised
by Mr Eko. Some of my Lost clips are actually lost, so I had better trawl
through my videos and catalogue everything. I used some clips from the
X-Files as well, though as time goes on students are less familiar
with this series. My article on the religious themes in the X-Files
is on the articles section of the website. In one scene one of the main
characters, Scully, is saying the rosary (you don't see that too often
in TV drama), while her partner Mulder is blowing the lid on yet another
government conspiracy. I also used a clip of Scully going to confession,
where she talks about being afraid that God is speaking but that no one
I used a short Father Ted clip just to illustrate a point about
stereotyping of nuns and priests and to raises issues relating to the
respectful treatment of religion. However I don't particularly like the
underlying attitudes in the show and was somewhat reluctant. The attitude
of the boys was that it was only a bit of fun. Joan of Arcadia
got a look in as well - the US show where God appears to a young girl
in various guises. A clip from 7th Heaven was necessary to be comprehensive,
though I got the feeling some of the lads didn't like it. I used a nice
clip from a popular (but rough and sometimes adult in nature) series Band
of Brothers, which is about the aftermath of D-Day. In an early episode
a captain reflects and prays on the day's events, and promises God that
if he survives the war he'll live a peaceful life. My Ballykissangel
clips tape has gone missing, but I showed clips from Paradise Island,
the American version, a short-lived series which was quite enjoyable.
Next week I hope to do a class on relevant animated series, especially
The Simpsons and God, The Devil and Bob. More of that anon.
I plan to turn these clips into digital files so I can play them from
the laptop, perhaps as Powerpoint presentations.
an excellent film recently that might be useful in religion class. I saw
The Execution of Private Slovik many years ago and it made a lasting
impact. It's the true story of Eddie Slovik (played superbly by Martin
Sheen) the only American soldier to be executed since the Civil War -
he was shot for desertion in World War Two. It's hard to get and I finally
found the video on Ebay recently - the only version available seems to
be this American NTSC video which means it won't play correctly over here
unless you have an NTSC compatible video machine. I got one of those recently
so I could finally catch up on some American tapes (including some Peter,
Paul and Mary concerts which include gospel material). I hoped I wouldn't
find it dated (it was originally broadcast on US TV in 1974), but thankfully
I didn't. It was simple basic and hard hitting, and as moving as ever.
Two scenes in particular are useful for class - around the middle of the
film the chaplain talks to the firing squad about the morality of it all,
and towards the end there is Slovik's final experience of the Sacrament
of Reconciliation. He prays on the way to execution, but this scene is
tough going and may not be suitable for younger classes at least. And
without the context of the full film the emotional impact wouldn't be
saw the film Sophie Scholl: The Final Days - it's about a young
student, motivated by her Christian faith, campaigning against the Nazis
in Germany during the war. The religious element is there, but subtly
integrated. In German, with English subtitles, it is riveting as we see
her interrogated by the German police, and all the more poignant as it
is based on real events. Julia Jentsch does a brilliant job in the main
role. Despite the setting there is no graphic violence, but there is plenty
of tension. One scene of particular use in class starts with Sophie praying
one night in prison, leading to a scene with her interrogator where conscience
is discussed. I hope to use this clip after mid term break as I'm doing
conscience with fifth year students. Another useful exercise I've found
doing this issue is to get the students drawingtheir own symbols for conscience.
I like to ramble around the class (purposefully of course!) chatting with
individuals about their symbols. Usually some will draw the angel-on-the
shoulder image, but whatever comes up it is a useful discussion starter.
finally a school update. Finished my classes on religion and film with
Transition Year on Friday last, with a final look at Jesus films
- showed two clips from The Passion of the Christ - the atmospheric
opening scene in the garden which I love, and a brief clip from the way
of the cross - where Jesus meets his mother at a cross roads on the way
to Calvary - it's very touching, especially when intercut with the flashback
of when Jesus fell as a child. Perhaps more of the brief flashbacks and
less of the intense violence would have helped the film achieve a broader
perspective on the life of Jesus.
Was looking at religious themes in films today in Transition Year class.
In a previous class I had broken the students in groups, each to list
films with religious themes in various categories - horror, serious drama,
comedies, biographies, and weird (films about cults, dodgy preachers etc).
Today I followed up this exercise with clips from relevant films. The
clips went down well I think: from Ken Loach's Raining Stones the
scene where the Irish priest (Tom Hickey, excellent) tries to persuade
the main character not to spend too much money on his daughter's first
communion dress; the sermon from The Field where the priest (Sean
McGinley, very unsympathetic) lambastes the locals for hiding a murderer;
a similar scene from On the Waterfront, where the priest (Karl
Malden, very sympathetic) encourages the dockers to stand up to the mob
and reveal who killed one of their members; the few scenes from Sister
Act were enjoyed, especially the scene in Church where the new choir
gets its first outing - corny I know; I felt I had to give an example
of a Biblical epic (can't stand 'em) so I showed the parting of the waters
from The Ten Commandments (great skit on that in the soup parting
from Bruce Almighty). The students were attentive, made some very
interesting points in discussions between clips and laughed at the more
subtle humorous moments (I've had classes that have sat stony faced watching
Fawlty Towers (English class!). Next week we're doing films on
the life of Jesus.
Finally saw Walk the Line last night - the Johnny Cash biopic.
More could have been made of the importance of religion in his life, but
there were some nice moments - his brother Jack getting familiar with
scripture to get ready for life as a preacher while Johnny listened to
country music on the radio. There's a funny incident when Johnny sings
a gospel song for a record producer who finds it too ordinary and unconvincing
- Cash misinterprets this as the producer thinking he, Cash, doesn't believe
in God! It's clear all along that both Cash and future wife June Cater
were inspired by gospel songs from an early age, and when she gets him
to leave behind the drink and pills it is suggested by a Church visit
that religion has a part to play in this turn around. But Cash is shown
warts and all, and his cheating on first wife Vivienne is particularly
painful. The film well deserves all the accolades it got, especially tghose
for the two performances at the heart of it - from Reese Witherspoon and
The Da Vinci Code film is out today - shown in Cannes and previewed
in Ireland. First indications are not so good, it seems the awful image
the book created for the Catholic Church has not been softened. It's hard
to get time to follow the controversy but I managed to write about some
of it for this week's Irish Catholic column (out on Thursday).
Last Monday in school a speaker from Hope Ireland (who have set up the
website gave a presentation to the Transition Year students (the Powerpoint
slides, with notes, are available free to download on that website). I
gave up 2 free classes to hear it! The presentation was excellent and
the speaker very knowledgeable (there's a section of the website to request
It was a tough audience, lots of awkward questions and comments, but he
handled it well. Just to show the prejudices out there - one student accused
the Church of flexing its censorial muscles! But this group is not calling
for boycotts or protest campaigns - the approach is rational and informative.
In fact the speaker assumed that many would be going to see the film.
A handful had read the book, some were obviously influenced, while some
couldn't remember much about it! The hour we gave to it was probably too
short - a double period would be needed, especially if the students are
responsive, as mine were. Personally I had a qualm - would all this attention
give the film more attention, publicity and even credibility? Probably
it will be getting all this anyway, so responding to it to clarify all
the inaccuracies is probably a sensible way to approach it.
By September it will probably be out of the cinemas, so the next wave
of publicity for the film will be when it comes out on DVD, presumably
near Christmas. When the students ask, I say I'll hardly go to see the
film as I wouldn't be keen to support something that was so opposed to
my faith. Maybe I'd have liked the speaker to take a similar line, though
he certainly didn't go anywhere near recommending the film.
Also on Monday we had a visitor from the Dublin Diocesan advisors who
came to present certificates of achievements to the TY students - some
of the work involved working on the religion and the arts theme and the
students displayed their wares. I'd certainly recommend taking up this
offer of certs from the Diocese. It's nice to be encouraged in the work.